Murdock: No one should be forced to join a union

NEW YORK - Even as they scream for "workers' rights," the one workers' right that union bosses despise is the right to work. Big Labor and its overwhelmingly Democratic allies oppose a woman's right to choose whether or not to join a union. Instead, they prefer that predominantly male employers and labor leaders make that choice for her.

The American Left has hoisted "choice" onto a pedestal taller than the Washington Monument. Liberals and their Big Labor buddies will race to their battle stations to defend a woman's right to choose to abort her unborn child. Meanwhile, they holler themselves hoarse to prevent her (and her male counterparts) from freely choosing to accept or avoid union membership.

Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., understands that exercising this choice is a basic human right, and neither private employment nor government work should require joining or paying dues to a union.

"Many Americans already are struggling just to put food on the table," DeMint said, "and they shouldn't have to fear losing their jobs or face discrimination if they don't want to join a union." Thus, on Tuesday, DeMint introduced the National Right to Work Act. If not today, then soon, a federally protected individual right to work should be signed into law.

The Act's economic rationale is compelling:

-- Among America's 22 right-to-work states (including Florida, Georgia, and Texas), non-farm private-sector employment grew 3.7 percent from 1999 to 2009, while it shrank 2.8 percent among America's 28 forced-unionism states (e.g. California, Illinois, and New York).

-- During those 10 years, real personal income rose 28.3 percent in right-to-work states and sank 14.7 percent in forced-unionism states.

-- In 2009, cost-of-living-adjusted, per-capita, disposable, personal income was $35,543 in right-to-work states versus $33,389 in forced-unionism states. Americans in right-to-work states enjoyed more freedom, plus this $2,154 premium.

Notwithstanding that right-to-work states are comparatively prosperous engines of job growth, the case for right-to-work is not merely economic but also moral.

"Government has granted union officials the unprecedented power to force individual employees to pay up or be fired and to coerce workers into subsidizing union speech," says the National Right to Work Committee's Patrick Semmens. "This fundamental violation of individual liberty -- an infringement on freedom of speech and freedom of association -- finally would end with passage of the NRTWA."

"Compulsory unionism...should not be lawful under a free government or tolerated by a free people," Donald R. Richberg argued in his book, "Compulsory Unionism: The New Slavery". As a labor attorney and federal official, Richberg helped draft landmark union laws, including the 1926 Railway Labor Act, the 1933 National Industrial Recovery Act, and the 1947 Taft-Hartley Act. Later in his career, however, Richberg considered such legislation authoritarian.

Richberg added: "A voluntary organization of workers united for self-help is inherently a much stronger organization than a union composed, to a considerable extent, of unwilling members."

Indeed, labor leaders should not fear voluntary membership. If their talents for securing higher wages, richer pensions, and cozier working conditions are truly as impressive as advertised, Americans should line up to sign up. If, however, unions must dragoon workers into their ranks, why should government allow or even mandate such bondage?

Last October, pollster Frank Luntz surveyed 760 private- and public- sector unionized employees. Eighty percent agreed that union membership and dues should be optional. Hence, the National Right To Work Act is good policy and good politics -- if only Republicans and free-marketeers would promote it.

Today's union bosses may dismiss the NRTWA as a right-wing plot. But they should recognize that it reflects the philosophy of a pioneer union boss.

None other than Samuel Gompers, founder of the American Federation of Labor, once wisely said: "I want to urge devotion to the fundamentals of human liberty -- the principles of voluntarism. No lasting gain has ever come from compulsion. If we seek to force, we but tear apart that which, united, is invincible."

(Deroy Murdock is a columnist with Scripps Howard News Service and a media fellow with the Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace at Stanford University. E-mail him at deroy.Murdock(at)gmail.com)

COLUMN

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

adobe illustrator

my friend told me that this blog is competitive. i will read more.Thanks for sharing your article. I really enjoyed it. adobe illustrator cs5

Right to Work Farce

he National Right to Work Act is nothing more than a liaison of government and Big Business. It’s being sold to us in the guise of Union corruption–workers being forced to join the Union or lose their jobs, which is so far from the truth.

It’s a scare tactic that portrays a Union worker as one who has no right to choose when in fact they chose Union to be free of Big Business’ greed and corruption. Maybe you should research Beck’s law to see that you DO have a choice.

I’m willing to bet that lobby money for the Right to Work Act far exceeds amounts spent by Unions for their lobbying efforts. Trying to portray Union lobbyists as a gigantic anomaly is taking advantage of those who don’t know the real truth behind lobbying and Big business. Look at the Health care and Drug industries for a comparison. You’ll be shocked

Without Unions there will be no good paying jobs, deteriorating work environment. There will be a push for more part-time workers, which gives business the only loophole in health benefit provisions of the new health care act–which just might get repealed when enough Republicans control the Senate and the House.

The Act means a big loss from all the gains the American Workers have achieved by uniting for their own self-interests–something that is being sold as wrong and selfish when in fact it is the last remaining characteristic of true America.

Voting or petitioning for the act will not only give the greedy corporate fat-cats what they want, but will severely impair the working class of America.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.