Vitamin D deficiency linked to prenatal infection

A University of Pittsburgh study links bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women to a deficiency of vitamin D.
"Bacterial vaginosis affects nearly one in three reproductive-aged women, so there is great need to understand how it can be prevented," said Lisa M. Bodnar, the Pitt assistant professor of epidemiology obstetrics and gynecology. The infection "is not only associated with a number of gynecologic conditions, but also may contribute to premature delivery -- the leading cause of neonatal mortality -- making it of particular concern to pregnant women."
Published this week in the Journal of Nutrition, the study also notes that African-American women are three times more likely than Caucasian women to have BV in part because darker skin pigmentation does not as readily convert sunlight into vitamin D.
Poor diet and obesity also contribute to a vitamin D deficiency.
The Pitt study used blood tests from 469 pregnant women to determine whether poor vitamin-D status played a role in predisposing women, and especially African Americans, to BV.
Bodnar and her colleagues at the Magee-Womens Research Institute in Oakland discovered that 41 percent of study participants had BV, and 93 percent of those with BV had insufficient levels of vitamin D. They also found that BV prevalence decreased as vitamin D levels rose.
"It was a purely observational study," Bodnar said. "We didn't give any vitamin D to participants."
Even though BV was more prevalent in African-American women, the study found that Caucasian women with low blood levels of vitamin D were equally susceptible to infection. Caucasians, though, are less likely to be deficient in the vitamin.
"Ninety percent of vitamin D comes from sunlight," Bodnar said. "So when that high a proportion comes from sunlight and something as basic as skin color prevents it from transforming light into vitamin D, it emerges as the No. 1 reason for BV."
Diet also is a factor in BV prevalence in women, especially in African-Americans, who are less likely to meet dietary recommendations for the vitamin. Milk is the most common source of vitamin D, but African-American women have a higher rate of lactose intolerance than Caucasians.
"There are not very many foods high in vitamin D, and those that are are expensive, including fatty fish, which many people can't afford," Bodnar said.
Optimal levels of vitamin D have yet to be established. For that reason, the study does not encourage women to begin taking mega-doses of vitamin D. Instead it recommends that women discuss their level of vitamin D with their physicians.
But women planning a pregnancy or already pregnant should take a prenatal vitamin, which typically includes 400 international units of vitamin D. "Vitamin D has no adverse effects, is inexpensive, easy to take and is acceptable to people," Bodnar said.
For now, interest in vitamin D "is hot," she said. Vitamin D deficiency has been linked to problems with immune response and increases in cancer rates, cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, diabetes and mental health problems.
"Bacterial vaginosis is another outcome to put on that list," she said.
Future Pitt studies, she said, will help determine whether vitamin D supplements can reduce infant mortality and other health problems affecting mothers and babies.
Bodnar's team recently received National Institutes of Health funding to study a large number of women, their vitamin D levels and rates of pre-term birth and pre-eclampsia -- pregnancy-induced hypertension accompanied by protein in the urine.
That study will help determine whether vitamin D deficiency increases the risk of poor birth outcomes and whether factors including obesity can help explain the higher infant mortality rate among African-Americans.

(E-mail David Templeton at dtempleton(at)post-gazette.com.)

(Distributed by Scripps Howard News Service, www.scrippsnews.com.)
Must credit Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Vitamin D optimum status.

Disease Incidence Prevention by Serum 25(OH)D Level" indicates that 55ng 1`35.5nmol/l takes us above the level associated with most chronic disease incidence.
It also appears to provide the best prognosis for those with cancer.
We also find peak muscle performance here and around this level we find human breast milk flows replete with D3.
Do we need to wait for research to confirm the primitive vitamin D status our DNA evolved to function best with and naturally attained and maintained by those spending time naked outdoors is probably the healthiest.
Isn't it common sense that the natural level our bodies naturally attain when outdoors naked is probably safe and probably ideal?
Would the human species have evolved successfully if this were not the case?
As living naked outdoors is not an option for most people then an equivalent D3 intake from Cholecalciferol is necessary to achieve an equivalent status. For most it will be over 2000iu/daily with 5000~6000iu being needed further from the Equator.
Grassrootshealth.org offer postal 25(OH)D testing for $40 for those who wish to check they are taking sufficient D3 to achieve the natural status associated with least chronic disease and optimum vitamin D3 in human breast milk. Surely a natural marker for optimal status. Vieth has shown 10,000iu/daily is a safe upper limit but that is more than most peple will need.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
+ four = nine
Solve this math question and enter the solution with digits. E.g. for "two plus four = ?" enter "6".