Scripps investigation spawns lawsuit against Applebee's

The largest casual dining chain in the world, Applebee's, faces a class-action lawsuit after an E.W. Scripps media investigation found that it and other popular chain restaurants touted "healthy" dishes that actually contained far more calories and fat than the eateries claimed.
Law firms in Kansas, Washington, New York and Illinois filed the suit against Applebee's International, its parent company DineEquity and Weight Watchers on behalf of every person who has eaten from Applebee's Weight Watchers Menu over the last four years, said Tara Kelly, one of the lawyers in the lawsuit.
Kelly said the idea for the lawsuit was spawned by the finding of a Scripps Television Station investigation.
Last spring, Scripps tested food in eight cities from popular chains that cater to calorie counters by offering what they advertise as special, health-conscious menus. The investigation found that dishes sampled at some Applebee's, Taco Bell, and Chili's restaurants, among others, sometimes contained as much as twice the calories and eight times the fat that the restaurants claimed in their published nutrition information.
Applebee's International, based in Lenexa, Kan., puts a lot of "rigor" into its calorie counting, company spokesman Miles McMillin said. "We take these claims very seriously," he said.
McMillin said that variability in portion size -- with larger portions registering more fat and calories than an average-sized portion on which the menu information is based-- is inevitable. "Our meals are handmade," he said. "They don't come out of a box."
The Scripps investigation named several restaurant chains; this suit focuses only on Applebee's, its parent company and Weight Watchers, but attorneys said they might pursue class action suits against them, too.
"It's certainly possible," said attorney Alyson Foster, who estimates that the number of people who ordered from the Weight Watchers Menu over the last four years was in the millions.
The chain has almost 2,000 locations in 49 states, 17 international countries and one U.S. territory. The financial scope of the lawsuit is not yet clear, Kelly said.
Claudia E. Dal Lago, a spokeswoman for New York City-based Weight Watchers, wrote in a statement that the organization has "demanding compliance standards" for its restaurant and licensing partners.
"Based on Applebee's testing and quality assurance programs, we believe that customers received accurate information," Dal Lago wrote. "Weight Watchers will continue to work with Applebee's to review these issues carefully."
Filed last September, the lawsuit is picking up steam as more Applebee's customers find out about it, Kelly said. Her firm has received hundreds of calls and e-mails from those customers. Kelly said she hopes the suit will include every person who has eaten from the Weight Watchers Menu in the last four years.
Kelly's team of lawyers has met multiple times with attorneys from Applebee's, and a trial is scheduled for spring 2010, she said.
Kelly wouldn't say if she or other attorneys have conducted their own food tests, or if they are relying solely on the Scripps' sponsored nutritional tests, which were conducted by Analytical Labs in Boise, Idaho.

(E-mail Isaac Wolf of the Scripps Howard News Service at wolfi(at)shns.com)

(Distributed by Scripps Howard News Service, http://www.scrippsnews.com)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Applebees/Weight Watchers

My husband is on the Weight Watchers program and has a hard time figuring out points meals that he likes, so I have been having him go to Applebees by his office because I trusted that Weight Watchers would not allow their point values listed on the menu unless it was accurate. I am very upset that they have misled many people trying to follow the Weight Watchers plan! That is just greedy! Applebees is cashing in on a vulnerable group of people trying to lose weight!

Applebees/Weight Watchers

Legislators - stay out the the restaurant kitchen!

“I’m their chef not their dietitian,” was a quote from Chef Anthony Bourdain at a meeting of chefs. He was responding to a question about his heavy use of butter and cream from someone who knew he was a classic French Chef…shame on them for asking. The chef’s answer was right on.

This really plays to my frustration with legislators telling the restaurant industry what needs to be on menu boards, where fast food restaurants can or can’t open and blaming foodservice operators for obesity. Compliance to misdirected legislation on menuing is opening the door to lawsuits. This lawsuit and now class action started by a patron who ordered a Weight Watcher meal at an Appleby’s, had it analyzed to see if it matched the posted (mandated) nutritionals which of course it didn’t –that was predictable. Legislating the posting of nutritionals on menus demonstrates a total lack of understanding of how impossible it is for every order to come out exactly as posted. Preparing a dish for a patron using other than 100% pre-portioned ingredients with pretty much guarantees some plus or minus deviations from what’s posted. Take the dish to lab for analysis guarantees a trip to a lawyer next, then the media!

I have faith that when Appleby’s menu developers created and analyzed the Weight Watcher meal and put it on the menu it was done with honesty and integrity; not with a “gotcha” patron in mind bent on proving it incorrect. Enter the chef or young line cook building that dish for patron-gotcha and creativity on the part of the food preparer factors in. I’m assuming that with good intentions he or she may have added a little more dressing, sautéed it in a little more oil, added just a little more cheese, or made the portion just a little bigger all to make it just a little better. The cook took pride; the customer took them to court. It’s going to happen a lot.

Legislators that are getting the into restauant business are the same folks who decided that the Senate dining room should change the name of French fries to Freedom Fries after 9/11 (too clueless to know that french [small “f”] refers to the cut-style not the country), that parents are neither responsible for their kids’ obesity nor are they responsible for their own bad choices. This type of publicity just opens the door to law suits based on unreasonalbe expectations. Let's see can I get a case based on all of us that asked for a decafe and got regular coffee and stayed awake to watch the late late late show? Now those are damages!

Done Ranting!

Who's to blame?

I completely agree with the chef. It is irresponsible and ridiculous to hold a restaurant chain, that prepares fresh food, accountable for every calorie. I believe with all my heart that the customer that complained about the high calorie count would have complained even more if they were served a flavorless, small portion of food like the menu recommends. Regardless, a person seriously trying to lose weight should not be eating at dining establishment like Appleby's on a regular basis. Losing weight requires exercise and eating in moderation; consistently eating off a Weight Watchers menu at your favorite fast food joint is not going to do the trick. I'm tired of America blaming their obesity problem on the establishments where they eat and the commercials they watch that "subconsiously" force them to eat improperly. Regardless of what kind of oil french fries are cooked in, they are still fried potatoes. Common sense, America.

Applebys

I respectly would disagree. I think if Applebys is advertising there meals as having a valued number of points under a well known diet program, then they have an obligation to make sure they are serving meals based on that point value. If it means educating every "line" guy or chef then so be it. Customers are making the choice to patronize that restaurant based on that advertisement. I have been on Weight Watchers and I absolutely trusted that I was choosing a better option when I purchased those Applebys meals.

The prob lem.

I work at an applebees, the problem stems from the use of different oils on the grill / broiler. The recipes DO call for using PAM, however when its super busy its pretty likely your chicken tortilla melt is going to end up on that grill soaking up all the bacon and burger grease from the food being cooked right next to it, thus adding those 10 extra grams of fat.

Heres a thought, cook your own food! Stop eating out! Eating out is no way to eat healthy, no matter WHAT you order. Remember - your diet in a restaurant is always at the mercy of some angry 18 year old who just want to get off work and go hang out with his friends - the $8/hour grill jockey cares nothing about your health or well being.

Its ridiculous to sue a restaurant for making you fat - Trust me, those extra 10 grams of fat amount to all of 90 calories. 90 calories didnt make you fat.

Being an inactive lazy ass who watched tv 9 hours a day and sits at a desk 8 hours a day is what made you fat! get up and exercise.

Applebee's

To those of you who are offended by this lawsuit, you've obviously never needed to be on Weight Watchers. You have no idea about how much work and effort is put into being a Weight Watchers member. It's a complete lifestyle change and it's not easy. You cannot tell us to stop eating out at restaurants because that is not the solution nor is it feasible. Are we supposed to stay in our homes forever, avoiding social situations, special occasions or any other instance that would involve eating somewhere other than our own kitchens? As a Weight Watcher member we learn how to make better food choices, healthier choices so we CAN go to restaurants. A popular chain like Applebee's jumping on the Weight Watcher band wagon is a huge help to us in making better choices. I don't know whether the lawsuit is valid or not, but if they're not actually providing us with low-point meals, then just let us know! Take them off the menu! We're capable of finding something else to eat that will fit within our daily points target. Or we can simply go somewhere else. Bottom line - it's not right for you to jump all over the patrons ordering these Weight Watcher menu items. They're just ordering what they're led to believe are they healthiest choices on the menu. And instead of calling us fat and lazy how about you congratulate the individuals who have joined Weight Watchers and are putting forth the effort to change their lifestyle to become happy and healthy?

Applesbees' and weight watchers

Hello Everyone,

My name is Derick (D) I'm one of the founders of a non profit organization called weightlosophy.com. Weightlosophy mean's "using the love of knowledge and wisdom to break barriers in order to achieve a healthier life. We are here to take a stand against corporate conglomerates who's intentions are to mislead and harm innocent individuals who want solutions to problems [not other problems that their drugs cause].

We are hopefully here to make a difference and the more input we get the more help we can produce. Change doesn't occur from just one person, but one person can initiate it. We have been working non stop on this and hopefully it will help to change as many lives as possible, because it has already changed ours. Take a look at my testimonials.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
five * two =
Solve this math question and enter the solution with digits. E.g. for "two plus four = ?" enter "6".