WASHINGTON -- The homeless beggar near the office was smoking a cigarette and had a pack in this shirt pocket as he offered his cup for a handout.I figured, if he's got money for cigarettes, his financial need must not be urgent.The chief executives of the Big Three automakers flew in from Detroit on their corporate jets to beg for a $25 billion bailout.Their plan stalled when members of Congress figured the automakers' need must not be urgent. Not if they couldn't fly commercial. Nobody's asking them to fly coach, mind you.The scale and circumstances are totally different but the rule for begging is the same. If you want people to give you money, make them think you'll use it wisely.So far, the Big Three have not persuaded Congress that they'll use another $25 billion wisely."I think it will be throwing good money after bad," Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., said on MSNBC Thursday. "They've already burned through hundreds of billions of dollars and they haven't turned these companies around."The nightmare is 3 million American jobs lost next year if the Big Three go belly up. That could lead to another Great Depression. Nobody in the nation's capital wants that.So, even though Congress balked this week, help for the auto industry is far from dead.As Shelby observed, "Nothing's ever dead in Washington, D.C. If it's an idea ..... it will come back, and this is an idea to bail out the auto companies."President-elect Barack Obama said on CBS' "60 Minutes" that a complete collapse of the auto industry would be a "disaster." Government assistance is necessary, but, he said, it needs conditions. No blank checks.And Obama asked, "What does a sustainable U.S. auto industry look like?"We may already know. Matthew Slaughter, associate dean at Dartmouth College's Tuck School of Business, writing in The Wall Street Journal, answered Obama's question:"Well, it looks a lot like the automotive industry run by 'foreign' car companies that insource jobs into the U.S." He noted that in 2006, multinational auto or auto-parts companies with headquarters outside the United States had 402,800 American workers. And the employees' average annual compensation was $63,538.This is the upside of free trade and a global economy -- and it has benefited the South even as the region has been devastated by job losses to Mexico and overseas in the textile and furniture industries.Foreign automakers -- drawn by a lower-cost workforce, employer-friendly laws and tax incentives - are manufacturing vehicles in Alabama, South Carolina, Tennessee and other Southern states.While they are also suffering in the economic slump, these companies are likely to survive, analysts say. When the economy finally turns around, they'll be able to meet demand and grow.But Slaughter, who opposes the auto bailout, suggested that fewer companies will be willing to "insource" if the federal government bails out their domestic competitors. A bailout could cost American jobs here and trade overseas as other countries added even more protectionist measures, he said.Members of Congress are in a tough spot. They don't like helping American companies send jobs overseas, even if they also save jobs here.Rep. Walter Jones, R-N.C., told the auto execs at the House financial services committee hearing Wednesday he was speaking for the frustrated people of his district. He wanted some assurance that the companies would keep jobs here."When you're getting this money from the American taxpayer and you keep having these cars made, assembled overseas in different countries, what is the purpose of this loan? Is it to keep you viable so that you can continue to move jobs overseas?" Jones asked.The answer, basically, was yes.Richard Wagoner Jr. of General Motors said, "I'll tell you, from GM's side, we certainly do want to grow in China and Brazil and the places that are growing around the world. That's good for our business here."That's good business for the automakers, but it doesn't make Congress want to dig deep in taxpayers' pockets for a handout or a bailout.(Marsha Mercer is Washington bureau chief of Media General News Service. www.mgwashington.com E-mail mmercer(at)mediageneral.com)(Distributed by Scripps Howard News Service, www.scrippsnews.com.)
Latest Stories
By JIM ALEXANDER, The Press-Enterprise
By DAVID MOULTON , Scripps Howard News Service
By ISADORA RANGEL, Scripps Howard News Service
By LUKE DeCOCK, Raleigh News and Observer
By SCOTT OSTLER, San Francisco Chronicle
By HELAINE FENDELMAN and JOE ROSSON, Scripps Howard News Service
Scripps Howard News Service
By MAUREEN GILMER, Scripps Howard News Service
By JOE LAMP'L, Scripps Howard News Service
By JOHN M. CRISP, Scripps Howard News Service
By DAN WALTERS, Sacramento Bee
By ROSEMARY SADEZ FRIEDMANN, Scripps Howard News Service
By PATTI EWALD, Tampa Bay Times
By MARY CAROL GARRITY, Scripps Howard News Service
By ED DEL GRANDE, Scripps Howard News Service
By DWIGHT BARNETT, Scripps Howard News Service
By DENA FISHBEIN, Scripps Howard News Service
By SARAH WELCH and ALICIA ROCKMORE, getbuttonedup.com
By CARL NOLTE, San Francisco Chronicle
By TIM GRANT, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
- 1 of 2393
- ››
Wrong way to ask for a handout
Submitted by SHNS on Fri, 11/21/2008 - 17:23
Paying taxes unites us. It also divides us. People can pay five and even six times more in state and local taxes than other folks in similar circumstances making similar incomes.
Who's got your number?
In one of the fastest-growing forms of identity theft, crooks are stealing tax refunds by swiping personal information and using it to trick the Internal Revenue Service.




ShareThis





