It appears that Barack Obama will make closing the prison camp at Guantanamo Bay an early order of business for his administration. The prison has been so tainted in U.S. and world opinion and so damaging to the United States' reputation that it is simply not worth keeping.The problem is what to do with the 250 or so prisoners who remain there. Those who are cleared for release should be repatriated -- if we can find a country willing to take them.The rest will have to be brought to mainland prisons, as politically unpopular as that will be. Those we can try in federal courts should be. Others could face court-martials in the military justice system as called for in the Geneva Conventions.One hopes that those trials will show that we just didn't go around the world, snatching people for no reason. How the rest of the world feels about the process to date was neatly summed up to the Associated Press by Waleed Alshahari of the Yemeni embassy in Washington:"If the U.S. government has any evidence against them, they would try them and put them in jail. But it has been obvious that they have nothing against them. That is why they have not faced trial." After seven years, you do have to wonder.There is a legitimate concern about disclosing in open court the identify of CIA operatives, foreign agents working on our behalf, the cooperation of foreign governments and intelligence sources and methods.In trying to do this, the Bush administration went overboard and stripped the prisoners of so many rights they were basically facing kangaroo courts. Surely the Justice department, cleaned out of the sort of political hacks who produced the torture memos, and the House and Senate Judiciary and Intelligence committees can devise protections that will balance the competing interests.The most difficult part of closing Guantanamo will be bringing them to the mainland. Proponents of keeping Guantanamo open treat the move as if we're doing the detainees some kind of favor. After they get a look at a mainland super-max prison they may begin agitating to go back to Guantanamo.(Distributed by Scripps Howard News Service, http://www.scrippsnews.com)
Latest Stories
By CARL NOLTE, San Francisco Chronicle
By TIM GRANT, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
By JERRY DANIEL REED, Scripps Howard News Service
By SALVADOR GUERRERO, Scripps Howard News Service
By ROB OWEN, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
By BROOKE ADAMS, Salt Lake Tribune
By CRAIG WELCH, The Seattle Times
By JOHN TESSITORE, The Providence Journal
Sacramento Bee
By ADAM ASHTON, Tacoma News Tribune
By CLAUDIA BUCK, Sacramento Bee
By TIM BRITTON, The Providence Journal
By MIKE GORRELL, Salt Lake Tribune
By ARTHUR I. CYR, Scripps Howard News Service
By TERRY MORROW, Scripps Howard News Service
By SUSAN SLUSSER, San Francisco Chronicle
By TOM FITZGERALD, San Francisco Chronicle
By JOHN WAGNER, Toledo Blade
By CHUCK CAMPBELL, Scripps Howard News Service
- 1 of 2392
- ››
Closing Guantanamo
Submitted by SHNS on Tue, 11/11/2008 - 16:07
Paying taxes unites us. It also divides us. People can pay five and even six times more in state and local taxes than other folks in similar circumstances making similar incomes.
Who's got your number?
In one of the fastest-growing forms of identity theft, crooks are stealing tax refunds by swiping personal information and using it to trick the Internal Revenue Service.




ShareThis





