Months before the first ads ran on Proposition 8, San Francisco Catholic Archbishop George Niederauer reached out to a group he knew well, Mormons. Niederauer had made critical inroads into improving Catholic-Mormon relations while he was Bishop of Salt Lake City for 11 years. And now he asked them for help on Prop. 8, the ballot measure that sought to ban same-sex marriages in California. The June letter from Niederauer drew in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and proved to be a critical move in building a multi-religious coalition -- the backbone of the fundraising, organizing and voting support for the successful ballot measure. By bringing together Mormons and Catholics, Niederauer aligned the two most powerful religious institutions in the Prop. 8 battle.Ironically, it made San Francisco, center of the nation's gay community, a nexus in the fight against the recently gained gay right to marry.This Catholic-Mormon alliance was part of a broad pattern that underscored a critical difference between the rival campaigns: Yes on 8 sought to marshal support among many religions, while the No on 8 campaign often put religion on the sidelines. "People of faith, really of every faith, believed that marriage was between man and a woman," said Frank Schubert, political consultant to the Yes on 8 campaign. "They formed the core of our volunteer operation. They were largely responsible for the 70,000 contributions we got."Some clergy within the No on 8 campaign believed not enough respect was paid to religion. "Their focus really wasn't upon communities of faith," said the Rev. Roland Stringfellow, who works with the Center for Gay and Lesbian Studies at the Pacific School of Religion in Berkeley and was an active organizer in the No on 8 campaign. Stringfellow said No on 8's relative neglect of religion had a particularly profound effect on Latinos and African Americans, who hold strong religious views. "I really didn't note particular outreaches to communities of color."Exit polls show that religious views had a profound effect on the result, spanning racial lines:-- 84 percent of those who attend church weekly voted yes.-- 81 percent of white evangelicals voted yes.-- 65 percent of white Protestants voted yes.-- 64 percent of Catholics voted yes. Catholics accounted for 30 percent of all voters.A late push by many churches to win over their congregations played a decisive role in increasing turnout and swaying opinion, said Mark DiCamillo, director of the Field Poll, who analyzed the figures. The last Field Poll, conducted a week before the election, showed that weekly churchgoers increased their support in the final week from 72 percent to 84 percent. Catholic support increased from 44 percent to 64 percent -- a jump that accounted for 6 percent of the total California electorate and equivalent to the state's entire African American population combined. The shift in Catholics alone more than accounted for Prop. 8's 5 percent margin of victory."The Sunday before the election is just a very influential time for churchgoers," said DiCamillo. For religious conservatives, "there was a lot of interest and attention and concern on this whole issue, but they brought it to a big conclusion on the final weekend."The future for the religious coalition that supported Prop. 8 is unclear. "I don't know if it could be assembled again," said Schubert, aYes on 8 consultant. "It came together because of the unique nature of marriage, and how it carries across every ideological and theological boundary."Mormon church members undertook a mobilization, contributing an estimated 40 percent of the individual donations made to the Yes on 8's $30 million-plus campaign. Yet the Salt Lake City church, which did not contribute to the campaign, sees its involvement in politics as unusual."I don't think there's any sense in the church that this coalition has more life beyond this one issue," said Mike Otterson, a church spokesman. "We haven't created a permanent alliance of churches here. What we did here was we came together to protect traditional marriage."E-mail Matthai Kuruvila at mkuruvila(at)sfchronicle.com. For more stories visit scrippsnews.com
Latest Stories
By JIM ALEXANDER, The Press-Enterprise
By DAVID MOULTON , Scripps Howard News Service
By ISADORA RANGEL, Scripps Howard News Service
By LUKE DeCOCK, Raleigh News and Observer
By SCOTT OSTLER, San Francisco Chronicle
By HELAINE FENDELMAN and JOE ROSSON, Scripps Howard News Service
Scripps Howard News Service
By MAUREEN GILMER, Scripps Howard News Service
By JOE LAMP'L, Scripps Howard News Service
By JOHN M. CRISP, Scripps Howard News Service
By DAN WALTERS, Sacramento Bee
By ROSEMARY SADEZ FRIEDMANN, Scripps Howard News Service
By PATTI EWALD, Tampa Bay Times
By MARY CAROL GARRITY, Scripps Howard News Service
By ED DEL GRANDE, Scripps Howard News Service
By DWIGHT BARNETT, Scripps Howard News Service
By DENA FISHBEIN, Scripps Howard News Service
By SARAH WELCH and ALICIA ROCKMORE, getbuttonedup.com
By CARL NOLTE, San Francisco Chronicle
By TIM GRANT, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
- 1 of 2393
- ››
Catholics and Mormons came together on Prop. 8
Submitted by SHNS on Mon, 11/10/2008 - 13:31
Paying taxes unites us. It also divides us. People can pay five and even six times more in state and local taxes than other folks in similar circumstances making similar incomes.
Who's got your number?
In one of the fastest-growing forms of identity theft, crooks are stealing tax refunds by swiping personal information and using it to trick the Internal Revenue Service.




ShareThis





