A glance at some of the bigger parachutes for CEOS

As the stock market's rampage snatched billions from investors' portfolios, the spotlight is now on golden parachutes for the CEOs exiting troubled firms.

Lehman Brothers' Richard S. Fuld Jr. was hammered in Washington over the hundreds of millions he collected (between $250-million and $480-million since 2000, depending on who's estimating) before its bankruptcy nosedive. Part of his take: $24-million as he walked out the door.

On the flip side is AIG ex-chief Robert Willumstad, who took the politically safe route by declining a $22-million parachute when the government took over.

Here's a look at some past and potential exit packages (cash, pension, benefits, accelerated stock and options and other compensation):

-- $161-million: Merrill Lynch, Stanley O'Neal:

O'Neal left Merrill in October 2007 in the wake of an $8.4-billion write-down. The bulk of his hefty payout was for accelerated stock and options ($87.3-million) and vested options ($43.5-million) with a $24.7-million pension tacked on.

-- $56-million: Countrywide Financial, Anthony Mozilo:

Under Mozilo, Countrywide became the kingpin of subprime mortgages. Bank of America, which bought Countrywide in June, has agreed to give $9-billion to Countrywide customers to settle predatory lending suits.

-- $44-million: Washington Mutual, Kerry Killinger:

J.P. Morgan Chase acquired Washington Mutual last month after subprime loans drove the Seattle-based bank under. Killinger had left before regulators seized WaMu assets, marking the biggest bank failure in U.S. history.

--$24-million, Lehman Brothers: Richard Fuld:

Fuld accepted some culpability while blaming the media, short sellers and the government for an "extraordinary run'' on the legendary investment bank. Mark it down as the biggest corporate bankruptcy ever.

-- $19-million: Washington Mutual, Alan Fishman:

Fishman wins the prize for efficiency. On the job for less than three weeks before WaMu's sale to J.P. Morgan Chase, he was eligible for $11.6-million in cash severance and entitled to keep his $7.5-million signing bonus.

-- $16-million: Freddie Mac, Richard Syron:

The Federal Housing Finance Agency has indicated Syron may not receive the exit pay spelled out in his employment contract now that Freddie is under federal control. The thinly capitalized lender was placed into conservatorship Sept. 7.

-- $13-million: Bear Stearns, James "Jimmy'' Cayne:

The exit pay was chump change. Cayne reportedly made $161-million before the company collapsed in June and was sold to J.P. Morgan Chase.

-- $9-million: Merrill Lynch, John Thain:

Hold on. Bank of America, which bought Merrill, said Monday that Thain will stay on board with a major role in the combined company. He's on the short list to succeed BofA chief Ken Lewis, who faces mandatory retirement in four years.

-- $8-million: Fannie Mae, Daniel Mudd:

Like Syron, Mudd stands to lose part or all of his exit pay after the government took control. Mudd reportedly disregarded warnings from his managers that lenders were making too many loans that would never be repaid.

Source: James F. Reda & Associates

(Distributed by Scripps Howard News Service www.scrippsnews.com)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Could you ride herd on a hundred billion?

No one here will look to the responsibilities these men had or the risks that they were asked to take. If someone had asked them to take the safe road and settle for simply average gains on the income statement they would have been run off the street on a rail by every investor in every company on this list. The street demanded extraordinary profits. The street demanded these men take risks. They drove their organizations to the edge of the abyss BECAUSE WE TOLD THEM TO DO THINGS THAT WAY.

RE: Could you ride herd on a hundred billion?

No one will look, because it's completely irrelevant. The CEOs of sound companies, like BofA, Citigroup, and JP Morgan-Chase were/are under the same pressures yet they didn't irresponsibly run their companies into the ground. These men failed, and no one, especially the taxpayers, shouldn't bear the burden of rewarding failure.

Very Valid Points

But these men did not intentionally run their banks and brokerages on to the rocks, the tide, that has not gone out in a hundred years suddenly decided to recede. Your house is suddenly worth half of what you thought it was worth, not because these men failed, but because the system failed them.

It still stands that a basket ball player who can barely spell his name can be signed for eight figures, and the CEO of a bank or company who is charged to keep hundreds of billions safe, AND GROW THE BANK or company that it be safe from takeover, AND PRODUCE the profits demanded by the stock holders, and otherwise INSPIRE his workers and his depositors to be productive, is very well entitled to his pay. If a man can guide a bank or other company to an annual profit of ten billion to satisfy all of obligations to his employees, customers, and stock holders, and accepts a mere ten million for his trouble, he has made only one tenth of a percent. One one thousandth part. By percentage of work product he works for the lowest rate. And he or she is paid less than a basketball player most of the time.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.