The unprotected among us

The development of increasingly effective vaccines is one of medicine's great triumphs. Thanks to large-scaled vaccination programs, the World Health Organization has wiped out smallpox and is close to doing the same to polio.

But here at home we have a problem. As Scripps Howard News Service reporter Lee Bowman found, "Hundreds of thousands for children are going to school this fall without protection from deadly diseases."

It is a worrisome development and one whose resolution is neither simple nor cheap.

Bowman reviewed filings with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and found that more than 135,000 children started school last fall exempt from vaccine requirements. And anecdotal evidence suggests their number is growing. Further, more than one in four toddlers under age 2 are not being vaccinated on schedule.

Infectious disease specialists say that for some diseases the level of vaccine coverage had dropped below the level of "herd immunity," where isolated cases of the disease won't spread into the general population. This could threaten to undo years of progress in public health.

Dr. Paul Offit of Children's Hospital in Philadelphia puts it most starkly: "At some point, we're going to be forced to decide whether it is an inalienable right to catch and transmit potentially fatal infections."

There are many reasons for this growing gap in vaccine coverage.

Younger parents especially grew up in an era where the childhood diseases that afflicted earlier generations -- polio, measles, whooping cough, mumps, rubella -- were simply not an issue.

As the number of vaccines has grown, so has their cost and the complexity of giving them over $900 for a boy and $1,200 for a girl, birth through 12. The problem is particularly acute for underinsured families and those with no insurance.

There are a growing number of parents, stoked by the Internet, who believe the shots themselves are harmful, responsible for autism or developmental problems.

And it is relatively easy to opt out of mandatory school vaccinations. All but two states allow exemptions for religious beliefs and 20 allow exemptions for personal or philosophical reasons.

Addressing the growing number of unvaccinated -- and, by definition, at risk -- children is a matter of public education, research, adequate funding and a medical community engaged with the problem. It should not take the inevitable epidemic to get us to act.

(Distributed by Scripps Howard News Service, http://www.scrippsnews.com)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The unprotected among us

How you are able to say that vaccines have not made our children sick is rich and rich is exactly what all you "believers" have become. Look most children in the eyes you'll see the blank stares, that's great they won't get measles (so you claim) they'll be chronicly ill and retarded. That's better. Clean and Green up the vaccines and maybe we'll think about getting them, until then why don't you take the recommended schedule and see how you feel.

Prove That Vaccines Are Safe!

The truth of the matter is that vaccines are not responsible for eradicating disease; vaccines never have been proven safe and effective; and vaccines are actually what is responsible for the spread and promotion of disease.

If these vaccines are really that safe and effective then prove it! Dr. Paul Offit published a study in the Journal of Pediatrics, which stated, "each infant would have the theoretical capacity to respond to about 10,000 vaccines at any one time." This is hard to believe. Dr. Offit I challenge you to prove this, not on a child but yourself. Inject yourself with 10,000 vaccines body-weight calibrated to the equivalent of a six-pound baby. Be sure that the vaccines contain thimerosal and aluminum. I patiently await for you to prove your statement.

In the event you choose not to inject yourself with 10,000 vaccines, the Journal of Pediatrics needs to redact your study immediately. If not, one can only conclude that the journal publishes "junk science."

PROVE THAT VACCINES ARE SAFE............

That was beautiful Todd!!!! I would love for the pro-vacciners to get just the recommended schedule and see how they feel. How about all the members of the CDC. Let's start with them.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.