It's been the summer of the great tomato scare, and it's not been pretty.People eyeing their neighbors' salsa with suspicion. Burgers without that wonderful red beefcake on top. Salads without those perky, juicy red slivers. Weeks of wondering if a chilled tomato-cucumber-cilantro mixture is a death sentence. And all over America, one question: Why?More than 1,000 people in 41 states and Washington, D.C. have gotten sick from a multi-state salmonella outbreak -- the largest in a decade, and the government seems clueless about whether tomatoes or fresh jalapenos or Serrano peppers are the cause or where the contamination is coming from or how to stop it.Lou Dobbs, the CNN business know-it-all, says President Bush should be impeached over the mess at the Food and Drug Administration, which is responsible for safe food. Dobbs said the FDA is "excessively intellectually challenged" and "moronic." To leave the FDA leadership in its "sorry condition," Dobbs said, "is alone, to me, sufficient reason to impeach a president who has made this agency possible and has ripped its guts out in its ability to protect the American consumer."The FDA keeps issuing bulletins warning against eating raw red plum, red Roma and red round tomatoes. "We're getting closer to identifying the source or sources," the FDA said. That was early in June.Most recently the public was warned against eating hot red peppers. The elderly, people with immune deficiencies and infants are particularly at risk, the government warned. Seriously. Do parents feed infants hot red peppers?The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta says tomatoes are "particularly susceptible to contamination." Again, why? Can't a nation that makes tissues pop up one at a time out of a box and sells plastic bottles of tap water for $1 each develop a salmonella-proof tomato? (It should be noted that people who grow their own tomatoes on the vine are not at risk.)There are the usual conspiracy theories. This is a bioterrorism plot. Americans without tomatoes are cranky. Others say it shows that the huge new powers to track tainted food that the government was given after 9/11 aren't sufficient. The new Bioterrorism Act is supposed to require importers, distributors and processors to maintain records on where all produce purchases are made and how they are used. Ha! Like that worked.Not surprisingly, the government says it does not have the authority it needs to require so-called trace-back authority. The New York Times quotes former FDA officials as saying the FDA has the authority but not the will or the "impetus." Basically, it seems that the technology exists to trace farm products to the table, but this government does not want to burden the industry to require tomato growers to trace a product from the marketplace to the field, using electronic systems such as UPC codes, even though California already insists growers do that.Last fall the FDA came out with a "food protection plan." But the White House did not ask Congress for money to pay for it. Well, not until Americans began getting sick. Last month the Health and Human Services Department said it would seek $125 million for food protection. Next year. (It's not as if food safety is as important as spending $1 billion a week to help the Iraqi government.) Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., said the delay in getting money to protect American consumers from bad food is "criminal negligence." There goes his invitation to the next State Dinner.It's tempting to blame all this on incompetence. But it's more a question of whether, in rejecting ridiculously restrictive government regulations, the Bush administration has swung the pendulum too far in the opposite direction, leaving people at risk. Somewhere there's a happy medium.In the meantime, it's time to make friends with that neighbor down the road who has her own garden.(Scripps Howard columnist Ann McFeatters has covered the White House and national politics since 1986. E-mail amcfeatters(at)nationalpress.com.)(Distributed by Scripps Howard News Service, www.scrippsnews.com.)
Latest Stories
By ROB OWEN, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
By ROB OWEN, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
By TERRY MATTINGLY, Scripps Howard News Service
By AIDIN VAZIRI, San Francisco Chronicle
By DAVID YOUNT, Scripps Howard News Service
By GREGORY K. FRITZ, The Providence Journal
An editorial / By Dale McFeatters, Scripps Howard News Service
By MIKE HARRIS, Scripps Howard News Service
By MARTIN SCHRAM, Scripps Howard News Service
By LAVINIA RODRIGUEZ, Tampa Bay Times
By JAY AMBROSE, Scripps Howard News Service
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
By POHLA SMITH, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
An editorial / By Dale McFeatters, Scripps Howard News Service
An editorial / By Dale McFeatters, Scripps Howard News Service
By CARLEY RONEY, Scripps Howard News Service
By MAX MESSMER, Scripps Howard News Service
By RON COOK, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
By ROB OWEN, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
By CHRIS CAMPBELL, Scripps Howard News Service
- 1 of 2395
- ››
America's great tomato scare reveals FDA's inertia
Submitted by SHNS on Thu, 07/10/2008 - 18:02
Paying taxes unites us. It also divides us. People can pay five and even six times more in state and local taxes than other folks in similar circumstances making similar incomes.
Who's got your number?
In one of the fastest-growing forms of identity theft, crooks are stealing tax refunds by swiping personal information and using it to trick the Internal Revenue Service.




ShareThis






KNOWN SOLUTIONS
To produce a bacteria free tomato requires either growth in a sterile environment or reducing possible internal tomato bacteria, prior to sale to the public via irradiation (proven safe and effective by the Agricultural Research Service; having studied it for over 70 years).
If we could control the environment, we should, but we can't. Therefore, a solution using irradiation seems like the only way to solve this problem. Numerous articles mention the public will accept irradiation if they are educated about it. Many other articles indicate that if the public is misinformed about irradiation, they will be against it.
The fear mongers who have claimed irradiated food becomes radioactive have made another important point. What are the long term affects of irradiation? They ask, "What will be the result in 50 years?" Fortunately we know after 70 years and many generations there is no adverse late effect.
Irradiation has been advocated by every major scientific organization in the US. It is already being done on imported foods which are examined with x-rays through enclosed containers.
Maybe 5,000 lives lost a year and 73 million illnesses a year do not impress the FDA.
Could they reach the level of corruption in Los Angeles Superior Court? Judge Kronstadt? Not as corrupt as him. Want to bet.