An entertaining drama about the 2000 electoral mess

HBO's "Recount" (9 p.m. EDT Sunday) is an entertaining political drama, one in which both Democrats and Republicans get dinged, but the film is clearly sympathetic toward the underdog Democrats.

"Recount" tells the story of the 2000 election and the tight race in Florida between then-Vice President Al Gore and then-Texas Gov. George W. Bush. Since everyone knows Bush prevailed, there's no suspense about the outcome, but following the twisted, oftentimes-maddening journey to that point is filled with tension and dark humor.

Credit that to actor-turned-screenwriter Danny Strong, better known for playing nerdy Jonathan on "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" and college-newspaper editor Doyle on "Gilmore Girls." This is his first produced screenplay. Strong and director Jay Roach ("Meet the Parents") set up and repeatedly hit home what they perceive as the key strategic differences between the Bush and Gore campaigns and their reactions to the recount.

James Baker (Tom Wilkinson) for Bush declares: "This is a street fight for the presidency of the United States."

Cut to Warren Christopher (John Hurt) for Gore, who states, "We want to proceed as if this is a proper political process, not a street fight."

"Recount" is told from the point of view of Ron Klain (Kevin Spacey), Gore's former chief of staff, who's nursing a grudge over being kicked out of the campaign, although he has recently returned. He pushes strongly to fight for recounts with the assistance of Michael Whouley (Denis Leary, "Rescue Me"), an election-data whiz.

Laura Dern plays Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris, dolled up in far too much makeup, as the ultimate know-nothing. It's a hilarious and vicious portrayal. Is it intended to be a parody -- or a portrait? Viewers will make that call.

"Ten years ago I was teaching the chicken dance to seniors. And now I've been thrust into an electoral tempest of historical dimensions," the clueless Harris tells a far more intelligent aide. "And the eyes of the world have landed on me!"

Even Baker declares, "This woman is hopeless. We're gonna need some help on this."

But "Recount" is not just a dark comedy, it's a dense, dramatic exploration of the fallibility of the American electoral process that, per the film's script, illegally disqualified 20,000 people from voting, half of them blacks.

Perhaps the film's greatest, necessary flaw -- aside from poor casting for the disembodied voice of Gore, who's heard over the phone -- is that the story is as exhausting as the film's almost-two-hour running time. For Democratic partisans, watching "Recount" may be a painful prospect.

In the end, neither political campaign looks all that good. The Republicans appear to be bullying thugs and the Democrats seem overly high-minded and out of touch with political reality. As we find ourselves in another election year, the lessons of "Recount" might prove useful to those crafting strategy for the current presidential campaigns.

(Contact TV editor Rob Owen at rowen(at)post-gazette.com.)

(Distributed by Scripps Howard News Service, www.scrippsnews.com.)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

"Recount's" dishonesty

The author of this film, Danny Strong, conducted his "research" so as to avoid certain fundamental facts, most notably that Bill Daley and Warren Christopher did not "wimp out," and that Al Gore, not Ron Klain or others on the ground in Tallahassee, called the shots.More to the point, Strong put words in Christopher's mouth--words that create the impression that he didn't have the stomach for a fight--words that Christopher never uttered ("pure fiction" as he called it inthe New York Times).

Instead of providing to Daley and Christopher the same courtesies extended to others in the film, such as Klain and Baker (script review; scene approval; rough cut screening and, in Klain's case, access to the set), Strong waited until after shooting had begun to contact either Daley or Christopher, then refused to give a copy of the script to Christopher. He and HBO now disclaim any intention to lead the public to believe they they'll be viewing a faithful rendition of history, claiming that all they want to do is to convey “the essence of the truth,” as Strong has said. What he sidesteps, of course, is that the film is being sold to the public not as the “essence” of what happened in 2000 but as “the story of the 2000 presidential election.” Strong and HBO know that the public treats as fact what is fed to them as "docu-drama," embracing the tacit proposition that they are flies on the wall, witnessing historic events as they occurred. That what the public is consuming is an ounce of “docu” for every gallon of “drama” is an inconvenient truth, certainly for Danny Strong and HBO. And like it or not, what the viewers treat as fact becomes fact for others in this generation and those following.

Liberal Lies

Bush Won! Get over it!!!!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
16 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.