Imagining a world minus automobiles

The adjective "quixotic" must have been invented for the idealists who would like to rid the world of automobiles. The word, which we owe to the fictitious knight-errant Don Quixote, usually implies the impractical, or even foolish or unbalanced, pursuit of an idealistic and romantic cause. And what could be nuttier than trying to abolish the car, the worldwide symbol of success and prosperity? Nevertheless, there are people who have taken up this unlikely mission. You can find them at www.worldcarfree.net, which is an international clearinghouse for a collection of organizations that are committed to reducing or eliminating the automobile as the primary force that shapes the way we live. Organizations in the World Carfree Network sponsor publications and programs that promote pedestrian-based living areas and other anti-automobile campaigns. One of them, Toward Carfree Cities, sponsors an annual conference that attracts people who are interested in alternatives to automobile dependence. Last year's conference was in Istanbul; this year they're meeting in Portland, Ore.And the Mobility Justice Project pursued a successful campaign to prevent the World Bank from supporting a ban on human-powered rickshaws in Dhaka. You could even join Autoholics Anonymous. Ordinarily organizations and programs like these don't get much attention, and when they do, they're often dismissed as part of an idealistic fringe without much connection to the realities of our hydrocarbon world. But with gasoline approaching $4 per gallon, with significant uncertainties about the future of the world's oil supply, with global warming, with the prospective explosion of the car market in China and India, and with a weakening highway infrastructure, maybe these people deserve a second look. Some of them see automobiles as an unalloyed evil that deserves eradication. After all, cars depend on petroleum that, for the most part, no matter where you live, has to come from other parts of the world. The crucial role that petroleum plays in our culture occasionally requires us to look the other way when foreign dictators misbehave. In fact, the story of international strategy for the last 100 years has been largely the story of the protection of the automobile's gasoline supply. In most of the places we live, cars dominate the landscape. Figures vary, but it's safe to say that there are around 600,000,000 cars in the world. With India and China coming on strong, that number could double over the next couple of decades. Internal combustion engines, and the processes that produce their fuel, are so bad for the environment that most of us are willing participants in massive group denial about the implications of all these new engines belching out greenhouse gasses. And did I mention that close to 45,000 people are killed every year by automobiles in the United States alone? But the motivations that drive the organizations involved in the World Carfree Network aren't all negative. Some of them envision the construction of a quieter, cleaner, healthier, more serene, and safer world. They're attracted to the notion of living and working areas that aren't dominated by the isolation inherent in an automobile culture. They like the idea of being able to walk in their neighborhoods to accomplish most of the errands that normally require us to fire up an internal combustion engine. And for longer trips they favor the creation of clean, comfortable, electrically driven public transportation, in which, instead of driving through traffic and gridlock, one could relax, read, watch TV, sleep, or surf the Internet. Some of us would miss the "freedom" that cars provide. And sometimes it's fun to drive. But these may be luxuries that the world's resources can no longer realistically provide. And would we really miss changing the oil, maintaining the tires, getting the annual inspection, paying for the insurance, and just generally taking our lives and health into our hands every time we venture out onto our overcrowded highways? The people at World Carfree Network may be dreamers, but theirs could be an idea that --like us -- has legs.(John M. Crisp teaches in the English Department at Del Mar College in Corpus Christi, Texas. John M. Crisp teaches in the English Department at Del Mar College in Corpus Christi, Texas. . E-mail him at jcrisp(at)delmar.edu For more news and information visit www.scrippsnews.com.)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The 70's all over again

Look, with all due respect, we heard this argument about world resources running out back in the 70's. Deja vu all over again.

We have plenty of oil. Only problem is that we aren't drilling for it.

This dream has no "legs." A car isn't a luxury item, it's a basic necessity. People aren't going to give it up no matter how much gas costs.

You've really gone out of your way to justify giving some free publicity for these fringe organizations. It didn't work well if you were trying to hide that.

Thanks for writing about the

Thanks for writing about the World Carfree Movement, Professor Crisp.

If anyone wants more information about the conference this June in Portland, OR details are here.

http://carfreeportland.org/

Towards Carfree Cities VIII: June 16-20, 2008
Rethinking Mobility, Rediscovering Proximity
Portland, OR, USA

The Towards Carfree Cities conference series brings together people from around the world who work to promote practical alternatives to car dependence. The conference attracts professionals, advocates, and community leaders who focus on the creation of sustainable transportation systems and on the transformation of cities, towns, and villages into human-scaled environments rich in public space and community life.

Counter Mainstream Thoughts on Living Meaningfully

In response to the comment that the only problem is lack of drilling:

They don't drill more because it's not economically feasible to do so.

Yep, the oil is there, but it's expensive to extract, and it's a finite supply.

Personally, I much prefer the intelligent approach of redesigning life so as to almost completely remove the need for the internal combustion engine.

That just sounds better.

Counter Utopian Thoughts on Currently Inefficient Technologies

Not economically feasible? More like restricted access for exploration. I believe in testimony before Congress yesterday, the subject might have been breached.

Again, the "finite supply" argument from the 70's fails the sniff test. Like 30+ years ago, advancements in technology aren't even considered from that perspective, and it's a glaring omission.

I prefer the intelligent approach of redesigning life only when the benefit exceeds the cost. To expect the civilized world to abandon their internal combustion engines in exchange for less efficient, more expensive technologies -- in addition to sacrificing their freedom to get from point A to point B on their own terms -- is utopian.

Again, cars aren't luxuries, they're necessities.

Such points of view aren't grounded in reality because they imply a regression of civilization and individual freedoms rather than advancement. The far majority of people will refuse to advocate such proposals based solely on their personal cost-benefit analysis.

right or wrong

I see both sides of the argument and utopian or not, we need to look for better ways. True, the automobile is the best choice currently for freedom and necessity. True again that a regression is needed in order for the utopian state to exists. However, if you look at history a little further back than 30+ years, you will see that there are series of regressions that enable advancements in all parts of society, including transportation.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
ten + = ten
Solve this math question and enter the solution with digits. E.g. for "two plus four = ?" enter "6".