The likelihood of a brokered or negotiated compromise between Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama in which the two would run on the same ticket was until Tuesday's Texas and Ohio primaries somewhere between slim and none. But the "morning after" her Texas and Ohio wins, Clinton went on the morning news shows and responded positively to interviewers' suggestion of such a possibility. So, let's consider what a compromise Obama-Clinton or Clinton-Obama deal might look like. Forget for the moment the complicated math it would take for either Clinton or Obama to clinch the Democratic presidential nomination. Let's forget the massive issue of egos and whether either senator would deign to give up a shot at the presidency and serve instead as vice president. Let's also forget the understandable personal dislike that may exist between these two formidable personalities.Imagine the two agree, instead, to join forces on the Democratic ticket. If there were to be a compromise between the two candidates, my thoughts are on the basis of age, Clinton should be given preference. But in exchange for that preference, she would also have to give up a substantial amount of power.Since Clinton is 60 now and will be 61 in October, if she were to agree to serve as Obama's vice president, she would most likely be 68 by the time she would be able to again run for president, assuming two successful White House terms for Obama. He, on the other hand, at 46 now, would be 47 when he became vice president with Clinton at the top of the ticket. Assuming the win of a second term for the team, Obama would be only 54 when he would start his next run for president.A reasonable price for his agreement to serve as vice president would be Clinton's pledge to run for just one term and give Obama (as vice president) responsibility for some major issue, as she was given control over universal healthcare during her husband's presidency (and with better results, one would hope). Since Obama's resume is most lacking in the arena of international affairs, additional powers as a roving international troubleshooter would add substantially to his credentials were he to run for president four years hence.At this point a brokered deal is unlikely to happen. It's also the Republicans' gleeful hope that Obama and Clinton keep fighting all the way to the party convention and onto the convention floor. That makes Sen. John McCain's path to the presidency all the easier.Clinton won Texas and Ohio by "going negative" against Obama and he will most likely have to respond in kind if he wishes to stay competitive. Then there's the fact that McCain can bank all his fundraising efforts now to fill the airwaves with commercials next fall, while Clinton and Obama are going to need to raise many, many millions of dollars just to keep fighting each other.On the other hand, if the two Democrats don't make amends, each stands to turn off important parts of the Democratic constituency through a protracted nomination battle. Clinton already has huge fences to mend with African-American Democratic voters. She has to figure out how to woo young Democrats and lure them to the voting booths in large numbers in November, just as they have turned out to vote in primaries in large percentages for Obama. He, on the other hand, has not been able to consistently win support from older white women and blue-collar workers.There is the very real possibility at this point that if they don't join as a team, neither one wins: the White House that is. Together they could be unstoppable.(Bonnie Erbe is a TV host and writes this column for Scripps Howard News Service. E-mail bonnieerbe(at)CompuServe.com.)
Latest Stories
By DAVID MOULTON, Scripps Howard News Service
By JOSE de la ISLA, Hispanic Link News Service
By DAN WALTERS, Sacramento Bee
By BABE WAXPAK, Scripps Howard News Service
By DAVE BOLING, Tacoma News Tribune
By ROB OWEN, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
By ROB OWEN, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
By AIDIN VAZIRI, San Francisco Chronicle
By TERRY MATTINGLY, Scripps Howard News Service
By DAVID YOUNT, Scripps Howard News Service
By GREGORY K. FRITZ, The Providence Journal
An editorial / By Dale McFeatters, Scripps Howard News Service
By MIKE HARRIS, Scripps Howard News Service
By MARTIN SCHRAM, Scripps Howard News Service
By LAVINIA RODRIGUEZ, Tampa Bay Times
By JAY AMBROSE, Scripps Howard News Service
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
By POHLA SMITH, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
An editorial / By Dale McFeatters, Scripps Howard News Service
An editorial / By Dale McFeatters, Scripps Howard News Service
- 1 of 2396
- ››
Attractions of a Clinton-Obama ticket
Submitted by SHNS on Wed, 03/05/2008 - 13:32
Paying taxes unites us. It also divides us. People can pay five and even six times more in state and local taxes than other folks in similar circumstances making similar incomes.
Who's got your number?
In one of the fastest-growing forms of identity theft, crooks are stealing tax refunds by swiping personal information and using it to trick the Internal Revenue Service.




ShareThis






Give it up. it wont happen
Obama would never consent to such an agreement. Why should he? He will remain ahead in PLEDGED DELEGATES. Pledged delegates represent the will of the voters. So if he is winning what negotiating room does she have? He will enter the convention short of 2025 but will have more pledged delegates, more states won and still maintains the lead in the popular vote. Hillary would hurt Obama if he was on the ticket. Plus, after her race baiting and cirulating the photo of Obama in African garb for all Texas rednecks to see there is no way he would want to associate himself with the vile Clintons. She said his entire campaign amounts to some speech. She gives him no respect.
Just Say NO
There is absolutely NO reason for Obama to agree to take on Clinton's baggage. She had a good night. She's had a good night before. He will still win the nomination, period. If he takes her on as a running mate, it will only tarnish him, and they will lose in the fall. While he would be an asset to her, that would only work if she were the frontrunner. She's not. Clinton's chance to extend that offer to Obama has come and gone - and it doesn't matter if she's older, her "I've earned it" entitlement still isn't enough to deliver the nomination to her. There is no advantage in an Obama/Clinton combined ticket, and I don't think most Democratic voters would like to see it happen.
Clinton-Obama ticket unbeatable!
What a smart thing for Obama and Clinton to team up! That would be a dynamite ticket and insure success against the GOP in the fall. Obama is a superb speaker but has no experience and it would behoove him to run as VP with Hillary in order to hone his skills and shore up his "shoe-in" status in 2016 as President.
The next time he says he agrees with Hillary in a debate, she should turn to him and say, "If you agree with me so much, then why don't you drop out of the race and support me in taking back America from the Republicans?"
That would be my ideal ticket but it would mean putting principles before personalities. If only he had the foresight to see what a powerful move that would be.
Dem in FL
I also think this combined
I also think this combined ticket is a great idea, and have been thinking about this very thing for several weeks now. I don't think Obama currently has the experience to be President, and would likely loose in the general election at least on that basis. How many loosers in a presidential election have re-run in a subsequent election? I haven't researched this, but I'm guessing very few (if any). If Obama truly wants to be President, he should not 'jump the gun' now but instead be patient, learn by being second-chair for a term (or 2) and then make his run for presidency when he then has the experience he currently lacks. And again, I think this Clinton/Obama ticket would be a winner, for all the reasons pointed out by Ms. Erbe. I would definitely vote for that combined ticket, but likely would not vote for Obama as president in this upcoming election due to the experience issue.