Polaroid, the inventor of "instant photography," next year will stop producing film for its instant cameras, having decided to concentrate entirely on digital photography and printing. The company, once synonymous with New England high-technology in its 1950s-80s incarnation, presumably believes that its decision makes eminent good sense businesswise, but it's regrettable nonetheless.For one thing, those digital prints just can't be compared to the joy of creating a nice shiny piece of film in less than a minute with a Polaroid. And who wants to worry all the time about computer files? Indeed, we suspect that many people are heartily sick of computers! (Recent reports suggest that traffic growth is slowing on the likes of Facebook, etc.)For another, Polaroid instant film is still used for some medical and industrial applications.And then there's that the demise of the film means one more group of physical pictures won't be archived. Digitally archived pictures and printed material are much more vulnerable to the ravages of time than are the physical things, assuming they are properly stored.Author Nicholson Baker has written eloquently about the effects that our delirious digitalization is having on the protection of our cultural legacy. The relentless obsolescence of computer systems and the way that computer hardware and CDs degrade fast will relegate much current stuff that people would like to look at in 10 years to oblivion. The effect of digitalization on research libraries is particularly regrettable.The demise of Polaroid film is yet another small nail in the coffin of our cultural legacy. But business is business. Let's hope that some cultural hero does a licensing deal with Polaroid so that someone else will continue to produce the film. They'll have some customers for quite a few years into the future.(Distributed by Scripps Howard News Service, www.scrippsnews.com.)
Latest Stories
By JIM ALEXANDER, The Press-Enterprise
By DAVID MOULTON , Scripps Howard News Service
By ISADORA RANGEL, Scripps Howard News Service
By LUKE DeCOCK, Raleigh News and Observer
By SCOTT OSTLER, San Francisco Chronicle
By HELAINE FENDELMAN and JOE ROSSON, Scripps Howard News Service
Scripps Howard News Service
By MAUREEN GILMER, Scripps Howard News Service
By JOE LAMP'L, Scripps Howard News Service
By JOHN M. CRISP, Scripps Howard News Service
By DAN WALTERS, Sacramento Bee
By ROSEMARY SADEZ FRIEDMANN, Scripps Howard News Service
By PATTI EWALD, Tampa Bay Times
By MARY CAROL GARRITY, Scripps Howard News Service
By ED DEL GRANDE, Scripps Howard News Service
By DWIGHT BARNETT, Scripps Howard News Service
By DENA FISHBEIN, Scripps Howard News Service
By SARAH WELCH and ALICIA ROCKMORE, getbuttonedup.com
By CARL NOLTE, San Francisco Chronicle
By TIM GRANT, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
- 1 of 2393
- ››
Instant-film oblivion
Paying taxes unites us. It also divides us. People can pay five and even six times more in state and local taxes than other folks in similar circumstances making similar incomes.
Who's got your number?
In one of the fastest-growing forms of identity theft, crooks are stealing tax refunds by swiping personal information and using it to trick the Internal Revenue Service.




ShareThis





