As has been said of second marriages, Iowa caucusgoers opted for hope over experience.A voter turnout of approximately the population of Jersey City bypassed the candidates of inevitability, big money, big names, known quantities and long experience to favor the two youngest and perhaps least experienced candidates in the race, Democrat Barack Obama and Republican Mike Huckabee, both frankly something of blank slates on the national scene.Two of the most experienced candidates, in terms of political credentials, Sens. Joseph Biden and Chris Dodd, were sent home. Thus, before the other 49 states had a say, Iowa served its self-bestowed function of culling the field. ABC News helped by eliminating three others from the New Hampshire debate.Caucusgoers said they wanted "change" and the candidates promised them "change" without exactly being precise about what they would change and how. The outcome and the general silence about George W. Bush could be read as a repudiation of his presidency and there is, in fact, no clear heir to his policies in the race. This cannot make Republicans feel comfortable about next fall.The caucuses are a thoroughly artificial event, not even representative of the people of Iowa. The for-real delegates to the national nominating convention, the presumed purpose of this event, will not actually be chosen until June.By then the nominees will have long been known. Thanks to frontloading driven by Iowa and New Hampshire, their identities will be settled on Feb. 5 in the political big bang known as Super Tuesday, when more than 20 states hold primaries.But it will be Iowa and New Hampshire on Tuesday that largely define those voters' choices. The presidential-selection process has moved from one small, unrepresentative state to another small, unrepresentative state.There has to be a better way.(Distributed by Scripps Howard News Service, http://www.scrippsnews.com)
Latest Stories
An editorial / By Dale McFeatters, Scripps Howard News Service
By MIKE HARRIS, Scripps Howard News Service
By MARTIN SCHRAM, Scripps Howard News Service
By LAVINIA RODRIGUEZ, Tampa Bay Times
By JAY AMBROSE, Scripps Howard News Service
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
By POHLA SMITH, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
An editorial / By Dale McFeatters, Scripps Howard News Service
An editorial / By Dale McFeatters, Scripps Howard News Service
By CARLEY RONEY, Scripps Howard News Service
By MAX MESSMER, Scripps Howard News Service
By RON COOK, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
By ROB OWEN, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
By CHRIS CAMPBELL, Scripps Howard News Service
By ANDREA ELDRIDGE, Scripps Howard News Service
By SHARON RANDALL, Scripps Howard News Service
By BILL SCHACKNER, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Raleigh News and Observer
By JOHN MURAWSKI, Raleigh News and Observer
By CARLA MARINUCCI, San Francisco Chronicle
- 1 of 2395
- ››
Making up our minds for us
Submitted by administrator on Fri, 01/04/2008 - 15:51
Paying taxes unites us. It also divides us. People can pay five and even six times more in state and local taxes than other folks in similar circumstances making similar incomes.
Who's got your number?
In one of the fastest-growing forms of identity theft, crooks are stealing tax refunds by swiping personal information and using it to trick the Internal Revenue Service.




ShareThis





