Edwards adopts a more aggressive strategy

By ROB CHRISTENSEN
Raleigh News & Observer
Thursday, November 22, 2007

John Edwards is taking an aggressive strategy against Democratic rival Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton -- warning against trading "corporate Republicans for corporate Democrats."

Clinton won't promise to end American combat missions in Iraq, Edwards says. She is helping the Bush administration pave the way for military action in Iran. And she is too cozy with the Washington lobbyists, from whom she accepts campaign contributions.

"Does anyone here believe that if we trade a crowd of corporate Republicans for corporate Democrats, there will be any change in Washington, D.C.?" Edwards asked this week as he campaigned in Cedar Rapids.

"Noooo," is the cry of a crowd that had been warmed up by performers Bonnie Raitt and Jackson Browne with the song, "Thing Called Love."

The former senator from North Carolina has not been filled with a lot of love toward Clinton in recent weeks, becoming the most aggressive Democratic hopeful in going after the New York senator. Now, the other Democratic presidential hopefuls are beginning to fire back. Edwards has gone from the hunter to the hunted.

Clinton accuses Edwards of "throwing mud." Illinois Sen. Barack Obama's campaign says Edwards is full of inconsistencies, citing Edwards' current support for organized labor after backing North Carolina's anti-union, right-to-work law when he ran for the Senate in 1998. New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson accuses Edwards of trying to start "a class war."

"I'm surprised at just how angry John has become," Connecticut Sen. Chris Dodd said recently. "That is not the same John Edwards I once knew."

The new aggressiveness is a gamble for Edwards as he heads toward the crucial Jan. 3 Iowa caucuses that could make or break his White House ambitions.

An ABC News/ Washington Post poll released this week found that the race continues to be tight in Iowa. Obama was the choice of 30 percent of Iowa Democrats surveyed from Nov. 14 to 18, while Clinton was the choice of 26 percent, and Edwards was the favorite of 22 percent. The margin of error was plus or minus 4.5 percentage points. A poll for CBS News and The New York Times, released last week, found that Clinton, Edwards and Obama are locked in a statistical dead heat.

Clinton has, for the most part, ignored Edwards' attacks. At a campaign appearance in Iowa this week, Clinton made no mention of Edwards.

Edwards and Clinton do not differ significantly on most issues. But Edwards has tried to cast himself as an outsider who will push for change, while depicting Clinton as part of the entrenched Washington establishment.

Edwards' recent aggressiveness -- a dramatic change from the sunny optimism that marked his 2004 run for the presidency -- has sparked mixed reaction among Iowa voters.

His attacks have turned off voters such as Evelyn Bland, 63, a farmer's wife from Shellsburg. She had been considering voting for Edwards but now says she will back Clinton.

"All his negativity with Clinton, that turned me off," said Bland. "I want them to tell me about what they are going to do, not what someone has done in the past."

But Ron Levine, 56, a data-systems analyst from Cedar Rapids, says Edwards is OK as long as he doesn't engage in personal attacks.

"I don't like negative campaigning," Levine said. "But I don't feel like he has crossed the line"

Edwards has walked a fine line. He doesn't call Clinton corrupt but says she is part of a corrupt system in Washington controlled by powerful drug, insurance and oil companies. Edwards that says he respects Clinton's positions but that voters have a right to know the differences between the candidates.

Edwards' criticism is almost exclusively directed at Clinton. He is vying with Obama for the anti-Clinton vote, so he is careful not to say anything that would alienate those voters on the fence.

Because of the quirkiness of the Iowa caucuses, Edwards does not want to anger supporters of the second-tier candidates. When Iowans caucus, supporters of candidates who receive less than 15 percent of the vote must find another candidate to back on a second ballot. Edwards hopes that he will be their second choice.

"I think the key to this is for people to believe what is true -- that I'm fighting for them," Edwards said after a campaign appearance at Grinnell College. "As long as the fight is on their behalf, to give them a real chance, I think they want to see that strength and that passion and that fight."

(rob.christensen(at)newsobserver.com.)

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
three * five =
Solve this math question and enter the solution with digits. E.g. for "two plus four = ?" enter "6".