ShareThisBy BRADY MCCOMBS
Arizona Daily Star
Thursday, August 23, 2007
The construction of seven miles of primary border fence near Sasabe, Ariz. is set to begin Monday without notice to the public about the project and no public comment period.
The bollard fence - 12-foot-high steel posts set 4- inches apart that form an impenetrable barrier for humans and large mammals but allow water and small animals to pass through - is expected to be completed by Christmas, said Border Patrol spokeswoman Dove Haber, with the agency's Tucson Sector headquarters. It will be built by Phoenix-based Sundt Construction Inc., which was awarded a $31.5 million contract from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
The fencing, the first primary, or pedestrian fence, to be built on a 240-mile stretch of rural border between Nogales and San Luis, is the first new stretch built in the Tucson Sector with funds from the Secure Fence Act of 2006. The agency has so far used those funds to extend existing primary fencing at Naco and Douglas.
The construction project also marks the first new stretch of primary fence built in the Tucson Sector since the mid-1990s, when the agency built fences in Naco and Douglas.
Federal officials issued a final environmental assessment for the project in July with a finding of "no significant impact" without publishing a draft or allowing public commentary.
That's a problem, say environmentalists like Matt Clark, Southwest representative for Defenders of Wildlife, who said the barrier will cut off dispersal corridors and potential habitat for jaguars, potentially closing the door on the animal's recovery in the U.S. It would also be harmful for pygmy owls and could damage other nearby wildlife habitats if the fence pushes illegal traffic and the law enforcement activity into surrounding areas, he said.
Although the fence isn't on the Tohono O'odham Nation, tribal Chairman Ned Norris Jr. also expressed concern that the project will adversely affect five of the tribe's cultural sites lying in the path of the fence and that the tribe was not properly consulted.
Border Patrol officials in the Tucson Sector said Monday they couldn't comment about why there was no public comment period or concerns about wildlife or cultural sites.
The agency said the Sasabe area was chosen for the barrier to help slow human and drug smuggling traffic through one of the busiest corridors in the nation, Haber said. There are already nine high-tech camera towers in the area as part of the SBInet Project 28. They aren't yet operational because of software problems that are being worked on.
Mitch Ellis, Buenos Aires National Wildlife Refuge manager, said the fencing would allow the refuge to reopen 3,500 acres along a five-mile stretch of the border that has been closed to the public for safety reasons since Oct. 3.
For environmentalists and some community members, the fast-tracked approval process for the project is troubling.
Clark said the lack of public comment period on the environmental assessment is legal but doesn't follow the intent of the National Environmental Policy Act, which requires federal agencies to consider environmental impacts of their proposed actions.
Wildlife manager Ellis said he also considers the lack of notice and comment opportunity odd.
"To not allow that is not really doing justice to the NEPA process," Ellis said. "When the EA (environmental assessment) came out with a zero-day comment period, it caught a lot of people's attention."
The fence will help slow some illegal traffic on the refuge and possibly allow damaged habitat to regrow along the border, but it won't solve the problem, Ellis said.
"If we want to gain operational control of small areas, it will work," Ellis said. "But is it realistic to fence off 2,000 miles of border? No, nobody is even suggesting that."
All the fencing - except for three-fourths of a mile in the middle that is on the Buenos Aires Refuge - will be constructed on a 60-foot easement that belongs to the federal government. For the stretch on the refuge, the government needs permission from Ellis, which he said he intends to grant but not until requirements are met.
"I'm not going to give them the permit until they go through the process and do it right," said Ellis, citing a pending biological opinion about jaguars and a cultural resource review about Tohono O'odham sites.
Tribal Chairman Norris said Border Patrol officials haven't handled the cultural assessment properly. He said their plan to start Monday is ill-advised and could be cause for possible prosecution under the Archaeological Resource Protection Act.
"That's really an unfortunate decision because as far as the Nation is concerned there are archaeological issues we are very concerned about," Norris said. "We don't believe the notices have been properly issued."
The fence will stretch from 4.5 miles east of Sasabe to 2.5 miles west of the port of entry there, according to the environmental assessment. The bollards are hollow steel tubes sunk 4 feet in the ground and standing 12 feet high, filled with concrete, Haber said.
Contact reporter Brady McCombs at bmccombs(at)azstarnet.com.
Arizona border fence construction set to begin
While "two wrongs do not make a right", I would like to point out the recent proposed legislation to grant massive national amnesty to at least 12 million illegal aliens, S. 2611, also waived the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act, which requires that legislation of such magnitude be preceeded by a federal environmental study to gauge its potential impact on our environment.
I saw absolutely NO reporting on this aspect of S. 2611 in all of the coverage I read while the bill was being debated, and I specifically do not recall hearing from Mr. Matt Clark and the "Defenders of Wildlife" speaking out about the harm which massive and unsustainable national population growth would do to the "habitats of our wildlife" and the quality of our environment as a whole!
Further, I have read repeatedly that some of the greatest havoc being wreaked by the unchecked illegal alien assault across our southern border has occured on the reservation of the Tohono O'odham Nation, where terrified residents evidentally are now confronted daily by aggressive illegal aliens threatening them and their children as these unwelcome foreign intruders freely cross their land, bringing with them fear, drugs, and crime. Perhaps Chairman Ned Norris might consider that none of these illegal aliens--many of them drug runners--currently sacking his nation bothers to "properly consult" the tribe before doing so either! And, perhaps in order to restore law and order to his tribal boundaries and to his people, Chairman Norris should consider that real life resolution of most problems require some compromise.
Illegal alien criminals
Environmental concerns being raised, are just an excuse for people who want to continue on the same lawless unguarded borders path. Sorry guys you lost, because americans are sick of supporting lawbreaking illegal aliens. If you don't like it, move out of the country!