SALT LAKE CITY - Mormon Latinos have launched a letter-writing campaign to Latter Day Saints Church President Thomas S. Monson, urging him to spell out the faith's position on immigration law, an issue they say is dividing the church
Activist Tony Yapias, of the advocacy group Proyecto Latino de Utah, says he launched the campaign with his own letter to Monson.
Besides letters, Latinos plan to wear ribbons signifying unity in their quest to have the man Mormons regard as a prophet speak up unambiguously on what they see as a moral issue.
"This is affecting our families," Yapias says. "Where's the church in this? The longer they stay quiet, the more political it gets, the more divisive."
Sandy resident Alfredo Gallardo says he, too, is writing Monson to express what many Latino Latter-day Saints feel.
"There is a double standard now -- one for Sunday and one for Monday through Saturday," he says. "We want to write to the prophet to say the feelings of brotherhood have to be followed all the time."
Mormon missionaries increasingly are confronted by prospective converts who believe the church is anti-immigrant, Yapias says, and some Latinos don't even feel welcome in their own LDS congregations because of anti-immigrant rhetoric.
The perception is due partly to the fact that a Mormon, state Sen. Russell Pearce, sponsored Arizona's new immigration law. Rep. Stephen Sandstrom, R-Orem, who also is LDS, hopes to bring a similar law to Utah.
Sandstrom agrees with Pearce -- that the church's 12th Article of Faith points toward rigorous enforcement of immigration laws. That article says Mormons believe in "obeying, honoring and sustaining the law."
In fact, Sandstrom said, Monson has spoken several times about the necessity of obeying laws, once referring to those who would "bend, twist and wink at violations of the law" as escalating illegal conduct.
Yapias, who is LDS and has a son on a Mormon mission, argues an immigration crackdown is at odds with the church's call for compassion and its practice of ignoring citizenship status when it comes to baptisms, church leadership positions, missions and access to temples.
Legislators such as Pearce and Sandstrom, Yapias says, "just are not getting it."
"They are not going to get it," Yapias adds, "until the church takes an official position."
Sandstrom says he doesn't expect the church to change its neutral stance.
"I cannot fathom," he says, "the church coming out and saying it's wrong to enforce the law when they've been so strong in saying you need to honor the law."
The Utah-based LDS Church did not directly comment on the letter-writing drive, but referred to a statement on its newsroom website and e-mailed a similar statement, attributed to spokesman Scott Trotter.
While the church "recognizes the complexities facing elected officials as they grapple with the implications of immigration law," the statement says, it has not taken a position on the issue "which is clearly the province of government."
Church leaders, it adds, "have urged compassion and careful reflection when addressing immigration issues affecting millions of people."
The LDS Church sends missionaries among undocumented immigrants across the country, baptizing many of them without asking about their citizenship status. The Utah-based faith also allows them to enter Mormon temples and serve missions.
"We're not agents of the immigration service, and we don't pretend to be," LDS apostle Jeffrey R. Holland told The Salt Lake Tribune last year, "and we also don't break the law."
Yapias has applauded other faith leaders, including Bishop John C. Wester, leader of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Salt Lake City, for speaking out against Arizona's new law and pressing for comprehensive immigration reform. But the Latino activist wants the state's predominant religion to take a stand.
"Why is it," Yapias asks, "that the LDS Church can't say what many other churches have said already?"
(E-mail reporter Kristen Moulton at kmoulton(at)sltrib.com.)
(Distributed by Scripps Howard News Service, www.scrippsnews.com.)
Must credit Salt Lake Tribune




ShareThis






Ambiguity
"Besides letters, Latinos plan to wear ribbons signifying unity in their quest to have the man Mormons regard as a prophet speak up unambiguously on what they see as a moral issue."
Good luck with that. Being unambiguous on some of the big questions isn't really something LDS Inc. does very well. They generally don't like painting themselves into a corner in that way.
If they come down on the side of the immigrants then they alienate their core base, and vice versa. It's best to be speaking out of both sides of their mouth on this one.
Darque
It is apparent that Yapias is
It is apparent that Yapias is the one that "doesn't get it," not the Mormon church. The Mormon church has already stated its position on the issue by the declaration of the 13 Articles of Faith. Elder Jeffery R. Holland is also right. The Mormons do not believe in breaking the law.
Immigrant Children
One of the tenants of the LDS, the most important theological difference between Mormons and all other Protestant Faiths, is that we do NOT believe that children are born with "original sin". In fact, we do not believe that children, under the age of 8 years old, can sin. We claim that Christ's atonement paid the price for the transgressions of little children as Christ proclaimed, "For such I have laid down my life".
Christ loved little children so much, that He willingly laid down his own life on their behalf. He rebuked his disciples when they attempted to turn little children away with His most compelling teachings, "Suffer the little children to come unto me and forbid them not for of such is the Kingdom of God".
I breaks my heart that so many Latterday Saints refer to the undocumented children of illegal immigrants as "Illegal Aliens" and want these children deported. What sin did these innocent children commit? Should we punish them for the transgressions of their parents? Isn't this contrary to the Articles of Faith that state, "We believe that man will be punished for his own sins and not Adam's transgression". Punishing children for the crimes of their parents is exactly opposite of the teachings of Jesus Christ.
These teachings are applicable when it comes to immigration law. I support the DREAM ACT and amnesty for all children who were brought here by parents before the child was age old enough to make the choice. This would extend for Constitutional Protections to those most vulnerable in our society, poor children. "Inasmuch as you have done it unto the least of these my brotheren you have done it unto Me", where Christ's words. We aren't going to be judged on how we cared for the rich, famous and influential. No. Everybody treats those people well because they can pay us back. The real test of character is how we treat the poor and disenfranchised.
Re..
A Woman From Utah Accuses Mormon Prophet Of Attempted Rape!