WASHINGTON - The day after President Barack Obama's State of the Union address -- during which he uttered exactly one sentence about immigration reform -- Democratic congressional leaders were asked if the issue was dead.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid stepped up to field the answer, even though the question had been directed at a colleague.
"The president, I don't think, dropped the ball," Reid said, explaining the White House has spoken to congressional leaders on the issue. "It's something we need to do. It's something we're committed to do and we will do it as soon as we can."
Reid's interception was a good save. The majority leader provided the affirmation that immigration rights advocates wanted but did not hear the night before, when the president only said that the country "should" continue work on fixing the immigration system.
"That gave us some solace," said Frank Sharry, executive director of America's Voice, a leading immigration reform advocacy organization in Washington.
Whether Democrats can, or should, make good on the promise to consider immigration reform this year is a decision involving deep political calculus for the coming midterm election.
Immigration reform can prompt among the ugliest debates of modern American politics, if past legislative battles are any guide. Each side carries deadly political ammunition to attack the other -- either as racist and bigoted or unpatriotic and freeloading, labels no candidate wants to wear.
Democrats are weighing the risks and rewards of bringing to the fore an issue that has so divided the country, as a heated fall election season quickly approaches.
Would it be better to go forward on a bill that is among the highest priorities of Hispanic voters in hopes of propelling an increasingly important constituency to the polls? Or would the backlash from opponents, particularly those on the conservative right, with their high-volume vitriol over illegal immigration, be too heavy an attack for Democratic candidates to sustain?
Democrats face a lackluster turnout this fall, with voters expressing nowhere near the enthusiasm they had during the Obama election of 2008. Health care, the No. 1 priority among Hispanic voters, according to a 2009 poll, is on hold. Some think immigration reform, the No. 3 issue, after the economy, according to that poll, could be a motivator.
Yet nervous Democrats can easily imagine the attacks it would bring -- that they are giving jobs to undocumented workers while jobless Americans collect unemployment checks.
Republicans have choices to make, too, as they decide whether to curry favor with conservative elements opposed to immigration reform -- especially as many incumbents are facing primary challenges from the political right -- at the risk of alienating an increasingly important voting bloc.
Republicans will also have to decide whether to follow the lead of GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, who is trying to forge a bipartisan solution with New York Democratic Sen. Charles Schumer on thorny immigration issues, including the long-running debate over a path to citizenship for the 12 million illegal immigrants living in the United States.
Clarissa Martinez, director of immigration and national campaigns at the National Council of La Raza, said failure to show progress on immigration reform this year would make it harder to motivate Hispanics to vote for Democrats this fall. "If they don't see movement on this, they very well may stay home," Martinez said.
The debate over whether to have the debate has exposed a rift separating the House, Senate and White House as Democrats struggle with the changing political landscape that is tilting toward Republicans.
The Obama administration has been working quietly behind the scenes with Hispanic leaders, devoting to the issue a team that is holding regular meetings in hopes of guiding legislation that could win bipartisan support.
Obama ran for office pledging immigration reform, even though he greatly disappointed Hispanic activists with his meager offering in the State of the Union speech. Martinez called it an "opportunity lost," and others said it was simply underwhelming.
"The White House is extremely committed to this issue and devoting significant resources," said Andres Ramirez, a senior vice president at NDN, a progressive policy organization in Washington, and vice chairman of the Democratic National Committee's Hispanic caucus, who is familiar with the administration's effort.
But House Democrats have grown tired of taking tough votes on controversial bills only to see them go nowhere in the Senate. Looking ahead to their own difficult election campaigns after the recent Republican Senate victory in Massachusetts, they are increasingly unwilling to do the heavy lifting.
Democratic Rep. Dina Titus of Nevada has supported immigration reform as a candidate, but would prefer to see the House focus on jobs and the economy before diving into a complicated new issue.
"The House has taken up a number of major issues that are still awaiting action in the Senate," Titus spokesman Andrew Stoddard said. "Rather than adding to that growing list, she supports letting the Senate move first while the House continues to focus first and foremost on creating jobs."
(Distributed by Scripps Howard News Service, www.scrippsnews.com.)
Must credit Las Vegas Sun




ShareThis





Americans of ALL backgrounds
Americans of ALL backgrounds oppose "comprehensive immigration reform" a/k/a mass amnesty. For example, a recent Rasmussen poll shows that 70% of voters support border enforcement and not legalization/ammesty.
The late Senator Edward Kennedy assured the American people that the 1986 "comprehensive reform" amnesty would be the last. We the People intend to hold him to his promise.
NO FORM OF ANY AMNESTY -- NOW OR EVER!
ENFORCE OUR EXISTING IMMIGRATION LAWS!
Hey Stan, can you tell Me
Hey Stan, can you tell Me where You got the Rasmussen poll results showing that 70% of voters support border enforcement and not legalization/ammesty? because I can't find it anywhere!.
illegal immigration
http://www.cis.org/articles/2006/2006poll.html
CIS is called a hate group by
CIS is called a hate group by the SPLC (and others). Citing a CIS poll on how many people hate immigrants is like citing a PETA poll on how many people look good in fur.
CIS is called a hate group by
CIS is called a hate group by the SPLC (and others). Citing a CIS poll on how many people hate immigrants is like citing a PETA poll on how many people look good in fur.
The SPLC is a hate group
The SPLC is a discredited organization with a very shady fundraising record. Morris Dees, the co-founder of Southern Poverty Law Center, is a master of hate-mongering who uses this tactic to scare contributors into donating money to the SPLC.
The tax-exempt SPLC flunked an audit by the Arlington-based Better Business Bureau's Wise Giving Alliance, which requires that "a reasonable percentage, at least 50 percent of total income from all sources, should be applied to programs and activities directly related to the purposes for which the organization exists." The SPLC spent only 11 percent of its total income on programs and activities directly related to the purposes for which the organization exists. The other 89 percent of the SPLC's total income was spent on fund-raising and administrative costs, including high salaries for its top officials.
The SPLC is comprised of a bunch of slick, parasitic hucksters who live high on the hog by raising money on behalf of needy people who never see a dime of it.
SPLC's sole function in the immigration debate is to attempt to discredit any individual or organization that supports reductions in immigration and enforcement of immigration laws against illegal aliens. Any individual, group, or organization that dares to speak out against illegal immigration takes on the risk of being added to the SPLC's infamous "hate groups" list as punishment.
use your common sense.
We have to find a sensible humane way to deal with people here illegally, illegal immigration is complicated but it can be resolve and it must be resolve in a way that oppose both our laws and our highest ideals.
we cant just easily deport 10 to 12 million undocumented people living in the shadow. That is not a practical way!
When you talking about AMNESTY? amnesty has no pay for fine,no back ground check, no learn english,no pay back taxes etc..but
Comprehensive immigration reform- have to pay fine, pay back taxes,background check,learn english, go back on the line, community service etc..That is not an amnesty..
So why not give the chance the people to have this comprehensive reform for undocumented people living in the shadow.
What an amnesty is
An amnesty does not mean that there are no conditions attached to the granting of the amnesty. An amnesty basically means that a certain group of people will be forgiven for having violated the law, and that they will never again have to fear being arrested or prosecuted for having violated those laws. These people who receive the amnesty still need to meet certain conditions in order to qualify for the amnesty. Do you really think that our government will knowingly give an amnesty to illegal alien gang members or career criminals? The only way to prevent this from happening is to do a background and criminal check on each illegal alien who applies for the amnesty.
Even the 1986 amnesty had conditions attached. Illegal aliens had to pay application fees, learn how to speak English, understand American civics, pass a medical exam, and register for military selective service. Those with convictions for a felony or three misdemeanors were ineligible for the 1986 amnesty.
You write as if English is
You write as if English is not your native language - syntax always gives it away. Therefore, it's not a stretch to assume you are one of those illegals and would say anything to be rewarded for breaking into the USA. "Real" American my left foot.
Americans of ALL backgrounds
Americans of ALL backgrounds oppose "comprehensive immigration reform" a/k/a mass amnesty. For example, a recent Rasmussen poll shows that 70% of voters support border enforcement and not legalization/ammesty.
The late Senator Edward Kennedy assured the American people that the 1986 "comprehensive reform" amnesty would be the last. We the People intend to hold him to his promise.
NO FORM OF ANY AMNESTY -- NOW OR EVER!
ENFORCE OUR EXISTING IMMIGRATION LAWS!
your non sense!
Your DEAD WRONG!!! Not All american oppose to "comprehensive immigration reform" and your AWEFULLY WRONG!! is not an amnesty!
Dont make any comment if you dont know what are you talking about.
It is an amnesty
Yes it is an amnesty. You are the one who doesn't know what you're talking about.
I think that people should be
I think that people should be a little bit more reasonable when discussing issues like immigration reform. Lots of families have eather been torn apart or suffered hardship due to the non working immigration system and we should be reaonable to consider others who are suffering because of the system before our own selfish interest.
This Country needs immigration reform and those who are undocumented should could pay fines, learn English and go through background check as to come out of the shadow.
Whether you accept it or not some of them still work but most do not pay taxes which is one of the ways to restore this crashing economy. Immigration reform and any form of freedom for those undocumented in the shadow aka "Amnesty" is a need for a better America, home of Immigrants, God bless the Uninted States of America and God bless all the activist who have labored to change the thinking of all those racist who belongs to the party of No.
Breaking and Entering
When you break into a country illegally, you take on certain risks. One of them being that you could be deported and leave behind a new family you had no business starting in the first place. Grow up and accept your responsibilities for the choices you made. No American citizen, i.e., America, owes you anything, and most citizens are tired of your unlawful presence and wishes you would go back to your own countries. And take your anchor babies with you.
Who are the racists?
Mega said:
"God bless the Uninted States of America and God bless all the activist who have labored to change the thinking of all those racist who belongs to the party of No."
Actually, it's the people who support amnesty for illegal aliens who are the racists.
Amnesty
You are just being emotional my dear. I know you have anger and hatred in your heart and mind of these unauthorized immigrant. I hope God will forgive you. This is a blessed country and majority of the people living in this country understands the struggle of these unauthorized immigrants. God loves a person who forgives the offense of another person as God send His Begotten Son Jesus to save all the sinners. Pray my dear so you will understand. God loves you.
Please tell that racist what
Please tell that racist what he should know, he is nothing but a member of the party of "No". May God forgive him for being inhumane to those who are suffering due to a non functional system. He just amnipulated a false poll claiming that 70% of Americans do not want immigration reform, maybe 70% of his racist family members and they forgot that eaither their grandfather or great grandfather came here without any documentation, anyway fools forget so soon.
Dry Backs
Your comments are enough to drive me to becoming an atheist. When our great grandparents came, there was no law to break. Most people who immigrated to the USA came legally and honorably unlike the gate crashers of the wet back kind.
wet back kind? what the hell
wet back kind? what the hell are you talking about?? There are illegall immigrants from Ireland, Poland, Romania, bulgaria, Africa, India and ,yes , Mexico. You have no compassion at all, no restrain for your hatefullness. Wait until all those "anchor babies" grow up and take command of this country, wait until they realize that what their parents told them was real, wait until they become engineers, doctors, lawyers and congressmen. Your kind is dimishing (people from the far right) and eventually will dissapear. Yes, this is a coutry of laws, but America is and will always be the most compassionate country that have ever existed.
Quit making things up
Mega:
It looks like you're the one who's making stuff up and trying to pass it off as facts. When you do this, you end up sounding like an ignorant fool.
I guess you are just another
I guess you are just another loser that blames immigrants for his misfortune. This country was found by immigrants, built by immigrants and is its very success depends on attracting immigrants.
I wonder how dumb do you have to be not to realize that it is better to know who is in the country than to have 12 million people living in the shadows.
Look at Australia's and Canada's immigration systems. They have a path for immigrants to become citizens and this is why they almost don't have any illegal immigrants. In the same time they have very strict laws and it is virtually impossible to get a job if you are illegal.
THIS IS WHY AMERICA NEEDS IMMIGRATION REFORM !!!
a rational, common sense
a rational, common sense approach to immigration reform that uphold America's values & that does not break up families. All humam beings are God's children.
a rational, common sense
While all illegals are God's children they are also citizens of other countries. Why don't we hear about any of them working for change in Mexico ? I mention Mexico because it's the country with most of it's citizens here illegaly.
Why reward lawbreakers?
Hey Gaston, American lawbreakers are God's children too. So, should we reward Americans for violating our laws like you want us to reward illegal aliens for violating our laws? Also, when an American lawbreaker is incarcerated, it breaks up families. So, should we quit incarcerating American lawbreakers to avoid breaking up American families?
Stan: Not All americans are
Stan:
Not All americans are opposed to comprehensive immigration reform. We need humane reform and need to fix the problem. Postponing this issue will only worsen the problem...
Enforce our current laws
The only immigration reform that we need is to secure our borders and enforce the laws that are already on the books. Handing out another amnesty to illegal aliens would be the worst thing that we could do. Amnesties don't solve the illegal immigration problem. In fact, amnesties simply perpetuate the illegal immigration problem. We gave an amnesty to about 3 million illegal aliens in 1986 and the illegal immigration problem today is 10 times worse. We need to learn from our mistakes and not make them again.
Change
Change is more than needed right now. And anything that may bring money to the table, should be more than welcomed. We keep thinking and saying, focus on jobs and the economy. But forget that with or with out jobs and the economy, we still have 12 million illegal immigrants living in the United States. Which also means they already have a job or may be getting jobs and may be a person of good heart that may love this country as much as anyone else. Who are we to say anything with out giving them a chance to make things right. They are here and may never leave and yet live a life just as anyone else. Giving good and honest people a chance is not so bad.
Amen ...enough said
Amen ...enough said
Contradiction
Illegal alien lawbreakers and criminals are NOT good and honest people.
You are WRONG!
Criminals, how f***ing dare you!
These people probably work a hell of a lot harder than you do; there is NO crime in overstaying a visa. What is wrong with you? Deportation proceedings are not criminal hearings, they are administrative hearings.
Get your facts straight before you post some ignorant comment about people you don't even know.
Get a clue!